Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Compare and Contrast: Speakers of the House

In Britain:
The Speaker of the House of Commons, Michael Martin, has resigned in disgrace "because of his failure of leadership over an expenses scandal" involving mostly other MPs fudging their own expenses.

In the US:
The Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, did not resign when he was caught on FBI counter-intelligence wiretaps in the late 1990s, "receiving suitcases full of cash from certain Turkish organizations, to do certain things... for them, and that some of his activities involved, actually, narcotics in Chicago."

The Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, did not resign in 2005 when he "pushed for federal funding for a proposed highway in northeastern Illinois so he and his wife could reap about $1.8 million from land deals."

The Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, did not resign when, in 2005, he was found to be the "top recipient of campaign contributions from (indicted felon Jack) Abramoff and associates."

The Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, resigned of his own accord in 2006 when his party last control of the House.

2 comments:

samarkeolog said...

Michael Martin may have resigned in disgrace, but sadly, (probably) to be ennobled and inserted into the House of Lords. So, in fact, he is going to be promoted to a more powerful position within our legislature.

(I know you were making a point about Dennis Hastert and it still stands - it's just that we're equally bad.)

lukery said...

Thanks samarkeolog.

Same as it ever was, huh.